The Islamic Revolution has proved to be the only counterpoint to the secular corruption of the repressive regimes that populate the Middle East and Central Asia. Islamic law is the the only bastion of belief that is politically unassailable by these regimes, for it is at the very heart of these societies belief systems. The attraction has been, to follow Allah's laws is to offer a moral and therefore a non corrupt path of governing.
In the 1970's the populace of Iran was drawn to the Islamic Revolution against the corrupt secularists of the Shah. The Islamist's offered a ray of hope that justice under Allah's laws would prevail. However Iran replaced secular repression with the theocratic repression of Allah's law. As long as the theocratic government of Iran was able to maintain its moral standing of being non corrupt it was able to maintain the support of the populace. Now with the all too apparent fraud of the Iranian elections the populace now sees that the theocratic government has become a corruption of Allah's law for its own ends. This has caused an uprising in the populace who have long been chafing under the moral repression of its theocratic leadership. . The hypocrisy has been exposed and the theocratic government is now seen as being as corrupt as the secular government of the Shah. This revelation that the followers of Allah's law are politically corrupt will in the end cause the fall of the theocratic leadership in Iran. This event is a watershed in the Islamic world whose ramifications no man can for see. This event in Iran is the beginning of bringing Islam out of the 14Th century and into the modern world of the 21st century.
Comments
A Moral Dilemma
The significance of events in Iran is that the entire Islamic world now sees that Islamic theocracies and their attendant moral repression are no better than the secular regimes they seek to replace. This is truly a shift in the earth for this was not an organized event, has no leadership, it was spontaneous combustion in repudiation of an Islamic theocracy that committed fraud.
Going forward the US has a choice, does it want to gain a tactical advantage in negotiating with the repudiated Islamic regime in Iran. Or does it go for the hearts and minds of the entire Islamic world. Mr Pitney of the Huffington Post suggested that the Iranians who have contacted him are pleading that the US not negotiate and thus give legitimacy to the current theocratic regime. This can be extrapolated to the entire Islamic world. Will the US once again legitimize a corrupt regime in the Middle East to gain a short term objective. Or will the US take the high ground and be that city on the hill that we so proudly proclaim ourselves to be?